It seems like to me that Missouri just followed the nation throughout the 80’s and in much of what they did in the 90’s. Some of that was okay, but when it came to the education of the children they did not want to follow the crowd and spend more. It sounded like they complained that the education was not good enough, but did not want to raise the taxes. This reminds me of a saying that you cannot get anything for nothing. I did read where the taxes were raised for the education, but it took a court order to do it. The people of the state should have done this on their own. I know that I want the best for my children and if I have to pay a little more then that is fine with me.
When I think of the agricultural business in Missouri all I can think about is the farming. I would say that is the only thing that sticks out in my mind because that is mainly what is around here. I never did stop to think about the farmers that raises the chickens and other livestock.
I would think that there was something other than just politics and farming that went on in the 80’s and 90’s, but that is all the book seamed like it talked about. There was a few main court cases in the 20 years that was talked about, but it was basically how Missouri compared to the rest of the nation. There should have been something in that time frame that was just Missouri that did not depend on the nation and it’s outlook on life. I guess with the way the book talks we just followed the crowd and did nothing to stand out.